Frankly, we didn’t expect to be spending quite so much time fact-checking. Today’s – possibly just this morning’s – is longer than usual but worth reading. Head over to the Fact Check page.
One thought on “Editors’ Note #13”
Comments are closed.
-
Follow
Following
Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
THE AMHERST CURRENT 
May I suggest that Mr. Steinberg should be permitted to provide the full context of his initial opposition to the Zero Net Energy by-law, back in the previous decade? He subsequently supported it in its second iteration in the following Spring Town Meeting, several months later. I would submit that this is another distortion of history by Ms. Dumont, specifically at Mr. Steinberg’s expense.
LikeLike