One thought on “Editors’ Note #13”

  1. May I suggest that Mr. Steinberg should be permitted to provide the full context of his initial opposition to the Zero Net Energy by-law, back in the previous decade? He subsequently supported it in its second iteration in the following Spring Town Meeting, several months later. I would submit that this is another distortion of history by Ms. Dumont, specifically at Mr. Steinberg’s expense.


Comments are closed.