3 comments

  1. Seems like repetition is necessary, once again. Amherst’s finances are greatly impacted by having non-tax-paying institutions with students, staff, faculty, service providers, and deliverers of materials/food/drink/ utilizing its roads on a daily basis. As well, they utilize water/sewer/electricity/waste recycling… As few students own homes, they aren’t paying property taxes. Until the MA legislature can somehow be influenced to alter its abstemious payment in lieu of taxes formula, property owners will continue to get squeezed to pay to subsidize the non-permanent residents and the total related impacts of these institutions. Local schools, roads, and facilities need fair support from these (nearly) free riders.

    Like

    • Payment in lieu of taxes (PILOT) could certainly help Amherst finances. But, UMass and Amherst College aren’t (nearly) free riders IMO. Users of water and sewer pay for these directly to the Town, not through property tax. And electricity and waste hauling are not paid for through the town, but direct with the provider. Also, while renters don’t pay property tax to the town, their landlords do…and presumably they pass the property tax onto their tenants through the rent they charge. That doesn’t mean that PILOT isn’t important, just that there are other, worthy reasons why.

      Like

      • You are correct that bills are paid to private companies for electricity and waste/recycling. However, roads are damaged by heavy waste trucks, and excavation is done for grid repair and upgrades. Both add to the wear of roads, and the companies aren’t sharing profits with the town to cover added costs.

        Like

Comments are closed.