By Anastasia Ordonez
“I’ve been hearing rumors that the district might be moving the 6th grade to the middle school. What’s the big deal, and why now?”
The rumors are true, and it’s a fair question posed to me recently by an Amherst parent as we walked our dogs through Amethyst Brook Conservation Area. Questions like this have been popping up lately as people are reminded of key decisions the School Committees must make soon to reduce crowding in our elementary schools and prepare for a new school building project.
Personally, I’m thrilled by the idea of my fifth grader joining his brother in middle school and getting three years there to learn the ropes instead of just two. Middle school is hard, and right now, our district’s kids only get two years to figure out how to manage more homework and independent study habits before they get pushed into high school. But I also get that some parents are worried and feel like the timeline for this decision is too quick, even if they agree with the basic idea of a move.
Thankfully, this conversation is not new, and our district has done a lot of work to get to this point. (Note that this upcoming decision only affects Amherst schools – each town in the regional district will eventually make its own decision about whether to move their sixth grade to the middle school.) The question was first examined publicly about ten years ago, when enrollment in the middle school had started to decline. More recently, the question came back up in relation to the proposed building project to replace both Fort River and Wildwood elementary schools. The sixth grade must move if we a) want a new, but smaller, building to replace both schools, and b) we want the state’s Massachusetts School Building Authority (MSBA) to help pay for it.
The MSBA confirmed this last December when they said they would approve either one kindergarten through sixth grade building of 320 students, or a kindergarten through fifth grade building of 575 students. The K-6 option of 320 students is basically a replacement for just Fort River at current enrollment levels, whereas a K-5 option would replace both Fort River and Wildwood schools simultaneously.
There are several reasons why we shouldn’t want a 320-student building. A Fort River-only replacement won’t work because we cannot afford to replace Wildwood on our own without state aid. And who wants to make Wildwood students and teachers wait years to replace their failing school building when we have a great alternative now?
Also, a building for 320 students is simply not big enough to accommodate our needs. Caminantes, the new Spanish-English dual language immersion program at Fort River, requires two Caminantes classes and at least one non-Caminantes class per grade, which translates into 420 students for a K-6 building. And Fort River and Wildwood have lost usable class space due to COVID social distancing requirements, as discussed this summer (page 13) by the School Committee.
Since the question of moving the sixth grade has come up in the past, the district undertook a feasibility study in 2019 to research whether there would be enough room at the middle school to add the sixth grade and how much it would cost. They even examined the high school as an alternative, but ultimately found that the middle school made more financial sense and would be cost-neutral.
Moving the sixth grade to the middle school has several developmental benefits for our students, too.
A Middle School Grade Span Advisory Group — consisting of teachers, parents, and community members — was formed in 2019 to study the educational and social-emotional needs of middle schoolers, and their final report was shared with the Regional School Committee. The report shared the pros and cons of a move but highlighted support from teachers, who know that the educational and developmental needs of middle school-aged children are better met in a dedicated middle school environment. Also, a 6-8 grade span is what most districts have in Massachusetts, meaning stronger curriculum options.
Simply put, our students benefit from more time in middle school so they can get proper advising and educational support to transition to high school. Two years just doesn’t cut it for many kids, especially those with special needs or who just need more help.
Next Tuesday, the Amherst School Committee will hold its second public forum to hear from community members about whether they support this move. The Committee will then formally vote on Oct. 5 on whether the move should happen and when. Public comments should be made by 3 p.m. on Sept. 21 via email at firstname.lastname@example.org or by leaving a voicemail message for School Committee Chair Allison McDonald at 413-345-2949. You can also choose to make your public comments live during the public forum via Google Meet (watch agendas here for meeting link and instructions).
Change is hard. But we know after years of discussion and study that our current and future students need us to act decisively now to move these projects forward. I hope that you will join me in asking the Amherst School Committee to vote in favor of a sixth grade move on the timetable that best serves students, so that all our children can finally benefit from healthy school environments.
8 thoughts on “Moving Amherst’s 6th-graders is a good idea – and gets us a new school”
While our family no longer has any children in Amherst Public Schools, I feel very strongly that it is our duty to ensure that the next generation of students is positioned for success. That means good buildings and good people.
The opportunity to provide a really good building for 575 kids annually is significant, and long overdue.
Continuing to delay takes a human toll, and I recall with great dismay the hue and cry of some of those against the last school project – saying that we would be able to get right back in line and have our building project delayed by only a year. Well it is now five years later…let’s not make that mistake again.
Thanks for this piece – it really helped me wrap my head around the issue and confirmed that this is the right decision regardless of the elementary school building process! If the teachers support it, we should all support it.
I am not in favor of either aspect of this move. Kids should not be pushed into adolescence. I believe the sixth graders belong in elementary school as a best developmental choice. I also believe in the neighborhood school concept. Schools should be kept as small and local as possible.
This is such an important blog and I’m grateful to you, Anastasia, for pulling all the background research together. I have a current 3rd grader and 6th grader at Fort River and wholeheartedly support this move for the many reasons you mention. And the sooner the school committee does it, the more we can prepare today’s 5th graders to graduate to the middle school alongside their 6th grade schoolmates.
LikeLiked by 1 person
My 11 year old granddaughter started 6th grade this fall, at her nearby middle school. She is loves having a variety of teachers and classes. And most importantly in my opinion, she is learning about time management, how to organize her homework and acquiring solid study habits. She will have two more years to practice these skills before she enters high school when the pressure will increase.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Let us not forget what was lost when Town Meeting overturned the last override, an early childhood learning center. Because early childhood learning in Amherst is expensive and hard to find, and many children are left behind at the start. The School Committee’s job is to look 16 years down the road and that includes early childhood learning. We took ten years to formulate a plan that included an early childhood center, how did that priority get lost? The idea of creating a true middle school, based on educational/developmental principles (such as 6th grade algebra) has been discussed in Amherst for years and it should be no surprise. But don’t let that distract us from what was lost, namely an early childhood learning center. For everyone, not just those who can afford it or were lucky enough to find a spot. Our great teachers and our exceptional children will solve the Middle School issue (over time) if we let them.
The author is a former Amherst Schools/ARPS employee in the Office of the Superintendent.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Actually, I remember discussions of moving 6th graders to the middle school occurring way back in the late 80’’s and several more times over the years. During my 29 years teaching in Amherst, this idea was discussed numerous times.
For all of the reasons stated above, I believe this is the right time to make this move. I would also like to add that many time students would come back to their elementary schools after beginning at ARMS. The comment I heard over and over was “I love it”!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks for this comment, Mary. It’s helpful to hear that this has been discussed many more times than just the couple I know about since moving here.
Comments are closed.