By Allison McDonald
A report on the regular meeting of the Amherst Town Council on Monday, May 18.
At its May 18 meeting, the Amherst Town Council received a sobering update on the town’s expanded rental registration and inspection program, alongside impassioned public comment on the collapse of the Beacon Communities affordable housing project at 246 Montague Road.
Rental Inspections: Violations in Most Units, Serious Issues in Half
Building Commissioner Rob Morra gave a presentation about the Town’s implementation of the updated rental bylaw. The original bylaw was created in 2014 primarily as a “registration and complaint response program.” One staff person was dedicated to the program, responding to complaints that came into their office. The Town Council passed a major update to the bylaw in 2024, enhancing permitting requirements and adding an inspection component to the program.
Morra reported that the registration and permitting program updates were implemented in May 2025, and the inspection program later in 2025. In the one year since initial implementation, more than 1,300 properties and 5,600 units have enrolled in the program. In roughly six months of active inspections, staff conducted 2,125 inspections, revealing problems in the vast majority of units.
Morra said about 96% of inspected units had at least minor violations, and 43% had at least one serious violation—numbers he cautioned were based on an initial sample but that underscore the need for systematic inspections.
Inspectors are finding issues such as:
- Exposed or improperly wired electrical fixtures
- Rotting or unstable handrails and exterior stairs pulling away from buildings
- Persistent mildew and possible mold from past flooding that was never fully remediated
- A sewer pipe with a hole venting sewer gas into a unit
- Deteriorating asbestos insulation on basement piping
“These issues… are being addressed,” Morra told councilors. “I think this is really doing a great service by making sure that these units are in good condition for the tenants.”
On occupancy, scheduled inspections identified only two of the more than 5.6K units inspected violating the “no more than four unrelated persons” rule, though Morra noted that figure applies only to the scheduled inspection cohort, not to complaint‑driven enforcement.
Most landlords, he said, have been cooperative; refusals to allow inspections have been the exception, not the rule.
The program was built around two inspector positions, plus support staff, but has effectively been operating with one inspector for much of the period reported, after the retirement of the longtime lead inspector. At that staffing level, several councilors warned, the intended five‑year inspection cycle could stretch toward ten.
Financially, the program is close to paying for itself. Morra said FY26 personnel costs are around $440,000, with about $398,000 projected in permit and inspection revenues, supplemented by a portion of UMass Strategic Partnership funds designated for safe and healthy housing.
Councilors broadly praised the program as essential in a town where a majority of residents are renters and where market pressures are intense.
Beacon Project Fallout: “A Moral Outrage” and a Missed Opportunity
Public comment at the beginning of the meeting featured sharp criticism of the failure of the Beacon Communities project at 246 Montague Road, which would have created more than 100 new affordable homes for seniors and working families.
Longtime resident Vince O’Connor said that “Amherst has a UMass housing problem, not a housing problem per se,” and attributed this to “UMass’s refusal to build affordable housing for its students.” He added that the “lawsuit filed against the project was not frivolous, because it ultimately would have defrocked the [town] manager of his power to act unilaterally as the community’s so-called executive authority.”
Planning Board member Jerah Smith, speaking as a resident, called the loss of Beacon “a moral outrage” and a failure of political will.
“The death of the proposal for affordable homes for seniors and working families at 246 Montague Road… is a moral outrage.”
He urged the town to approach large-scale housing proposals differently: “For anybody who is serious about supporting housing affordability, you need to start with a ‘yes‑how‑can‑we‑do‑that’ mindset, not an ‘only‑if’ mindset. When someone comes to us with a plan to build 140 homes, we should have said, ‘Hell, yes. How do we make this happen?’ But we didn’t.”
Smith framed the Beacon failure not as an isolated setback but as part of a broader pattern that leaves working families with nowhere to go.
District 2 resident Jason Dorney likewise warned that rejecting imperfect projects in hopes of an ideal solution leaves the town with no new homes at all.
“The Beacon project would have been a good project… We can’t let some high‑minded ideal of some great project get in the way of allowing some of the dirty work to happen. We have to build housing.”
He pushed back on efforts to shift blame primarily to UMass: “Amherst has a housing affordability problem. Period. We cannot force UMass to do anything… Denying that we have a housing affordability problem is just burying our heads in the sand and wishing for somebody to come in and save us.”
Several speakers linked the Beacon decision to broader concerns about who gets to live in Amherst, pointing to rising rents, long commutes for workers and students, and the scarcity of options for seniors and lower‑income households.
Other Business
Town Charter Review
The council revisited the “Beyond the Charter” section of the Charter Review Committee’s final report, which listed six major structural issues that would require the creation of a new Charter Commission and townwide vote in order to be pursued. These include:
- Changing Amherst to a mayor–council form of government
- Returning to Town Meeting
- Creating a smaller Town Council (e.g., 7–9 members)
- Lengthening and staggering terms for elected offices
- Allowing council to increase budget line items without increasing the total budget
- Electing Planning Board, ZBA, and Finance Committee resident members
After extended debate about feasibility, expectations, and the role of a future Charter Commission, the council voted 9–2 (two absent) to hold a townwide “listening session” within six months to discuss these six major structural changes. Councilors Mandi Jo Hanneke (At-Large) and Cathy Schoen (District 1) opposed the motion, expressing concern about raising expectations for changes the council cannot itself implement, especially major shifts like a mayor–council system or return to Town Meeting.
Hampshire College
Town Manager Paul Bockelman briefed the council on the rapidly evolving situation at Hampshire College, including:
- Complete campus closure after commencement
- A letter of interest from Trustees of Reservations and Kestrel Land Trust
- Work with the Hampshire College Early Learning Center to seek a new fiscal sponsor or location
- Preliminary work with the state on technical assistance for land use and zoning planning related to Hampshire properties
Town Proclamations
The council adopted a broad consent agenda on a unanimous vote that included the following proclamations:
- Proclamation Recognizing June as LGBTQ+ Pride Month
- Proclamation Recognizing Juneteenth (June 19, 2026)
- Race Amity Day Proclamation (June 14, 2026)
The next Town Council meeting is on Monday, June 1 and will include a public forum on the proposed FY27 capital improvement program.
An artificial-intelligence tool assisted in the making of this article by summarizing a recording of the meeting which was reviewed and adapted by the writer.
Discover more from THE AMHERST CURRENT
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
THE AMHERST CURRENT 
Why are people routinely barred from serving on the Planning Board for expressing views against overdevelopment; and yet allow people who think that questioning “build baby build” is a “moral outrage”and think the proper default answer is “Hell, yes”?
Why do people who say “We cannot force UMass to do anything” feel like full time residents of the town can be forced to accept projects on wetlands, overcrowding, and an economic sector where 43% of houses rented to students had “at least one serious violation”?
LikeLike
Ira,
I don’t think that any Amherst public commenters have advocated for a “build, baby, build” approach in our community. Nor has any Amherst resident used the phrase “moral outrage” to describe those who don’t blindly accept the recommendations of developers and landlords.
But you know who has recently used those phrases? Evidence-based NY liberal progressives.
As part of her statewide program to make housing more equitable and affordable, NY Gov. Katie Hochul recently introduced the “Let Them Build Act.” This is part of her “supply-side liberalism” agenda, which responsibly cuts through red tape to ensure that housing is not a luxury–it’s a human right.
That other phrase, “moral outrage” seemed familiar, too. Throughout the campaign trail, NYC mayor Zohran Mamdani has described NYC’s underdevelopment (yes, I said it.) as a “moral emergency,” leading to displacement, homelessness, overcrowding, and the inability of ordinary people to remain in the communities where they work and grew up.
He has sent his housing czar to Albany to urge reforms in SEQRA (the state’s environmental law) to make housing easier and less expensive to build. Additionally, NY voters passed a referendum to strip local officials of their veto power over most local projects.
We didn’t use those phrases, Ira. But the coolest libs on the planet did.
———————————-
Also, it’s simply a fact that Amherst residents can’t force UMass to do anything. Case in point: UMass Lowell maintains a literal nuclear reactor on campus (albeit, a small one intended for research purposes only) and local residents are powerless to stop it.
I think these commenters are trying to inspire the Town Council to use its extraordinary power over housing decisions to affirmatively craft a positive vision for Amherst’s future. Peer municipalities like State College, PA (Penn State) and Newark, DE (Univ. of Delaware) have each built 3,000+ bedrooms of purpose-built student housing (PBSH) in the last decade.
I interviewed the housing directors for both towns, who informed me that these PBSH bedrooms have:
– generated huge tax revenues for year-round residents;
– stymied family-home-to-student-rental conversions;
– been more environmentally-friendly than detached family homes;
– drawn students out of residential neighborhoods; and
– reduced rental pressure, leading to greater affordability for year-round residents.
Our failure to incorporate PBSH at scale into Amherst’s housing mix has led to all of the consequences that you rail against. Considering how beneficial PBSH has been to peer municipalities, don’t you think it’s even a remote possibility that building PBSH at scale in Amherst would confer similar benefits here?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Evan,
I will acknowledge that “build baby build” is hyperbole, if you acknowledge that homeowners aren’t racists, as you recently claimed.
But “moral outrage” IS a direct quote from a Planning Board member in the article above. That’s also who directly said “Hell Yes” is the right reply to every building proposal.
NYC is not the country’s second smallest town to host a flagship state university, so their perspectives are not relevant to Amherst.
Amherst is one of 5 towns in Western Mass that has met their affordability quota – the others are Chicopee, Great Barrington, Holyoke, Springfield. So how about some other nearby towns creating student housing, and transportation? Not everyone who works or attends college in Amherst has to live in Amherst.
Nobody can force UMass to do anything, true – but in something called “negotiations” you can extract promises and agreements from the other side. In my opinion, we have not negotiated effectively with UMass. (In my humble opinion, it has something to do with the number of people who are deciders for both the town and the gown.)
I attended Penn State, and so was especially disheartened when I heard residents and officials from State College complaining (on a series of calls between many college towns that Amherst residents and officials attended) that they think Amherst is quaint for fighting 5 stories, as they are now fighting 12 stories.
Lastly, purpose-built student housing will ensure that when there is much less demand for student housing (as so many are predicting) those buildings cannot be repurposed. I remember touring Carnegie Mellon and hearing that Andrew Carnegie built the floors on an angle in case the school failed and they’d be turned into gravity assisted assembly lines. At least our student housing should be flexible enough to accommodate future trends (again, declines in higher ed widely predicted by AI experts, sociologists, demographers, even the president of the UMass system.
I am hoping you will not have to reply again and then me again. Everyone knows what we both think, and tired of hearing it, I’m sure.
LikeLike
I want to thank the Amherst Current for recapping Town Council meetings. I am sorry however, that you chose not to report Jill Brevik’s commemoration of The Nakba, at the May 18 meeting; a very powerful statement of the history up to the present of the occupation, displacement, ethnocide, dispossession, apartheid and now genocide of the Palestinian people by the State of Israel, that has been supported and financed by US tax dollars. Why did you leave that out of your report?
LikeLike
Thank you, Gerry, for your comment and question. In our recaps of Town Council meetings, we generally focus on decisions taken or deliberations related to potential decisions of the Council, and so we often do not include a recap of of every statement, comment, or discussion at the meetings.
When the Council considers a statement through a resolution or proclamation, we often will list those (as we did this week related to Pride Month, Juneteenth, and Race Amity Day proclamations). Since there was no resolution, proclamation, or deliberation related to Councilor Brevik’s statement, we did not include it. If a resolution or proclamation based on that statement is on a future agenda, and the Town Council discusses and votes on it, we will cover that vote.
LikeLike
Thank you for your reply. While I don’t agree with your policy, I understand it.
LikeLike