By Nick Grabbe
It’s hard to believe, but in 1981 there were four weekly newspapers based in Amherst. They were:
The Amherst Record, a community paper going through changes;
The Amherst News, a cooperative run by former Record employees;
The Valley Advocate, an “alternative” paper free for pickup, and
The Amherst Bulletin, a free tabloid shopper owned by the Gazette.
In addition, the Daily Hampshire Gazette had a well-read second section called “Amherst Area News,” and radio station WTTT covered Amherst news every day. The UMass Daily Collegian, the Amherst Student and the ARHS Graphic all covered news from their schools.
But this history begins in 1977. The Advocate and Bulletin had been around for only a few years, while the Record had been Amherst’s home-town paper for over a century. The Record was published twice a week, cost 25 cents a copy, and the editor and publisher, Michael De Sherbinin, lived on Triangle Street. It was small-town, old-fashioned local journalism.

The Record published Town Hall news, lots of funky columns, and information from surrounding towns. When Princess Grace stayed at the Lord Jeff, there was a story and photo on the front page. “The Policeman’s Lot” was a precursor to the Bulletin’s police log. The Record published the voting records of Town Meeting candidates, box scores of ARHS baseball games, plus recipes and movie guides. A large Stop & Shop ad included a coupon for frozen French fries for five cents. An ad for a ranch house listed the asking price as $36,900.
But in 1977, Record employees went on strike, and the picketing of the Main Street offices divided the town. The strike was settled, but De Sherbinin ultimately sold the paper to an out-of-state company, which tried to turn the Record into a morning daily. That effort failed and was abandoned in 1980. The Record became a free weekly that residents could pick up at stores around the town.

Meanwhile, the Advocate grew dramatically in size, quality and influence in the late 1970s. Based in Amherst, it occasionally covered Amherst stories, such as a feature asking why five unrelated housemates were threatening to the town.

I was the managing editor of the Advocate in 1976-77, during which time it took aim at nuclear power, covered the local music scene, and strutted its baby-boomer bona fides by devoting an entire issue to stories about marijuana. The Advocate had its most successful period after I left, expanding its staffing, winning over previously reluctant advertisers, reaching a high level of quality in its journalism, and finally winning a major national award in 1979 for a series of articles on the impact of the Hadley malls on downtown businesses.
Amherst newspaper readers were well served in 1981 by having multiple sources of printed information. There wasn’t more to write about than there is today, but people paid a lot more attention to newspapers in the era before social media. And there wasn’t an overriding political issue like a parking garage or a new charter to get people worked up. It was just a heyday for newspapers.
But then, one by one, three of these four weekly papers folded or left Amherst. The Advocate, after being hassled by the building inspector over its Amity Street offices, moved to Hatfield. The News, which was avidly read by followers of town government, went under, largely because it wasn’t free and its low circulation couldn’t compete for advertising with the free weeklies. The Record, after years of losing money, went through a series of ownership changes, and alienated people by erecting bright-yellow delivery boxes on residents’ lawns without their permission. It published its last issue in early 1984.

I had been editor of the Bulletin since 1980, operating with a tiny staff and a mostly feature orientation. Barbara Dafoe Whitehead, who became a nationally known writer, got her start in journalism writing features for the Bulletin during this period. The pictured cover story about a hot-air balloonist was typical of the “soft news” the Bulletin presented, but there was occasionally some harder stories. One memorable one was headlined “Boston bankers ready to wait out nuclear war in Amherst bunker.”
Responding to the demise of the Record, the Bulletin expanded into news-gathering and became a broadsheet (full-size) paper in 1985. The Bulletin hired three well-connected and tireless reporters from the defunct weeklies: Nancy Newcombe, Phyllis Lehrer and Patrick Callahan.
As the only weekly left in Amherst, with extensive reach to readers from its free mail circulation and support from the Gazette’s advertising and production departments, the Bulletin expanded in its size and offerings. It established a commentary page and sections devoted to schools, sports, arts and leisure, and news from the campuses and surrounding towns. There was a local history column, features on local people, a calendar of events, high school honor rolls, and even Little League game reports and lists of new books at the Jones Library.
Over the next 15 years, the Bulletin covered some controversial proposals that have echoes today: a new elementary school, a renovated Jones Library, a new form of government, and a downtown parking garage.

The two biggest Amherst stories of the mid-to-late-1980s were the Town’s purchase of Cherry Hill Golf Course in order to stop plans for a condominium development there, and whether to allow a business that bought and sold used auto parts to remain at the old landfill site. Unlike most papers, the Bulletin did not run editorials taking positions on these or any other controversial issues.
Amherst’s public-access cable TV station started carrying Town Meeting live, and the sessions were often more interesting to watch than sitcoms. Newcombe and WTTT news director Tim Ashwell provided informed commentary, with Lehrer also speaking to viewers. The Gazette continued to report Amherst news daily, and many of their young reporters were excellent, but they rarely stuck around for long, and the editors were based in Northampton and rarely visited Amherst. The Springfield daily appealed to some Amherst residents who liked a morning paper, but it had limited readership or influence here.
Next in this series: In the 1990s, the Bulletin and Gazette merge their news-gathering operations, leading to the slow decline of Amherst’s weekly newspaper.
Great information and subject!
There also was the UMass Daily Collegian, even though it was a less thorough paper. Howard Ziff at UMass was a quite a motivating force for journalism. It really was a different time back in the 70’s to 90’s, given that it was before the internet. I found the Advocate’s model at the time interesting. Their papers were everywhere, and with a thorough listing of the Valley’s entertainment. The paper therefore got a lot of circulation with the college crowd.
Another interesting thing about that time period was the volume of paper flyers and notes posted and stapled to every telephone pole, bus stop, and bulletin board in town (and on campus). The UMass Campus Center walls going towards the Student Union were plastered multiple layers thick with ever changing notices. It really was an era of “print”. The papers were the best place for information (and to search for private used cars 🙂
LikeLike
This is really interesting, Nick! We arrived in Amherst 1998 (in Pelham 1996) and heard repeatedly about how we’d basically just missed it.
The Advocate was at that time still good to many community-based non-profit organizations that worked to make this a better community.
The Bulletin coverage mattered so much to our family from 1996 through an eventual obvious steady decline in staff and coverage until they started reprinting useless (and page hogging) editorials from the Gazette while they also stopped inserting it in our Thursday Gazette delivery. Many additional copies for relatives had been obtained over the years at then Gazette offices University Drive and then Hastings.
We still get daily home delivery of the Gazette, Republican, and NYT; guessing there are no longer many like us.
The Gazette and Bulletin together (Bulletin now finally being mailed after repeated problems 6 months) are a mere shadow of their former selves just in the time we’ve been here, yet we will still be sad to see them both go under.
The weekly Reminder in the Republican has surprisingly good Amherst coverage. But one outlet is never better than multiple outlets.
LikeLike
One other Amherst-based publication deserves mention—the UMass Amherst Campus Chronicle. It was not independent journalism, but it did publish letters to the editor critical of UMass administration policies and featured remarkable, artistic photographs by Stan Sherer. Resources were scarce on campus, and the paper included classified ads where Departments could swap or give away surplus office items that they could not sell publicly because they were state property. The administration replaced the Chronicle with an on-line publication that does not allow any exchanges of opinion among UMass employees about campus policies.
LikeLike
Thanks for the reminder about the Campus Chronicle. I remember it as a very high-quality publication.
LikeLike
Fantastic chronicle of the landscape Nick, and can’t wait for the coming installments. Re-experiencing euphoria…
Someone should write a book about this!
Tom Porter
LikeLike